Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search

Messages from 103725

Article: 103725
Subject: Re: Good free or paid merge software that edits two similar files?
From: "Weng Tianxiang" <wtxwtx@gmail.com>
Date: 9 Jun 2006 09:11:40 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi,
Now I have several options: (I don't care if it is free or paid,
because it is a company project, not personal one). The drawback of
WinMerge is its search function incompleteness during two file
comparison: During two file comparison, what I want most is a function
that uses two user-defined fast keys to search forth and back for
keyword different appearances and to find their differences between 2
versions. With WinMerge, there is no fast key definition for search.
When entering Ctrl+F, it pops a window to search for. If one is found,
you must enter Ctrl+F again to search next, ...

For example, if I define F3 key is to search forward, F4 key is to
search backward. After first highlighting a keyword, then pressing F3,
it would go to next key word appearance, or pressing F4, it would go to
next keyword appearance backward. Their implementation is not
difficult, but greatly reduce the timing to do search.

To relieve my pressure, can you please tell me whether or not the tools
you suggested and preferred have the functions?

Thank you.

Weng


AxisCompare, Compare,


Article: 103726
Subject: Re: ppc instruction count
From: "Alan Nishioka" <alan@nishioka.com>
Date: 9 Jun 2006 09:19:16 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
eascheiber@yahoo.com wrote:
> just one question, in xtime_l.c XTime_GetTime function shouldn't use
> mftb instead of mfspr. It does not seem to work ok /w mfspr.

That's odd.  It does look like XTime_GetTime *should* be using mftb.
But the mfspr code works fine for me (EDK6.1, EDK7.1, EDK8.1).

Alan Nishioka


Article: 103727
Subject: Re: Good free or paid merge software that edits two similar files?
From: "Alain" <no_spa2005@yahoo.fr>
Date: 9 Jun 2006 09:19:50 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi all,

I use KDiff (http://kdiff3.sourceforge.net/). It's free and very useful
(you can ignore case, space for instance). You can compare/merge file
and directory.

Regards

Marcus Harnisch a =E9crit :

> Weng,
>
> I guess nobody has mentioned (X)Emacs+Ediff yet. It makes only sense
> with text-based files of course.
>
> One highlight worth mentioning is the ability to take full advantage
> of the editing capabilities and syntax highlighting (as well as email,
> news-reading, doctor...) of (X)Emacs.
>=20
> -- Marcus


Article: 103728
Subject: Current from FPGA pins to ADC
From: m_oylulan@hotmail.com
Date: 9 Jun 2006 09:25:35 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
I want to use a Spartan II chip to drive two ADCs. The ADC spec says
that the input current on the SCLK pin is +/-0.5uA max and 10nA
typically. Similary the input current on the CS pin is 10nA typically.
The absolute maximum ratings for the same ADC state that the maximum
input current to any pins (except supplies) is +/-10mA. I'm using the
LVTTL standard and can only specify the drive current to a minimum of
2mA. Will I be doing the ADCs potential damage if I specify 2mA to
drive the SCLK and CS pins? 

Thanks,
Mees


Article: 103729
Subject: Re: Current from FPGA pins to ADC
From: "Peter Alfke" <peter@xilinx.com>
Date: 9 Jun 2006 09:44:54 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Mees, don't worry about the currents, just make sure that the voltage
ramges for FPGA and ADC are compatible.
Peter Alfke, Xilinx
=======
m_oylulan@hotmail.com wrote:
> I want to use a Spartan II chip to drive two ADCs. The ADC spec says
> that the input current on the SCLK pin is +/-0.5uA max and 10nA
> typically. Similary the input current on the CS pin is 10nA typically.
> The absolute maximum ratings for the same ADC state that the maximum
> input current to any pins (except supplies) is +/-10mA. I'm using the
> LVTTL standard and can only specify the drive current to a minimum of
> 2mA. Will I be doing the ADCs potential damage if I specify 2mA to
> drive the SCLK and CS pins? 
> 
> Thanks,
> Mees


Article: 103730
Subject: Re: Current from FPGA pins to ADC
From: "MM" <mbmsv@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 12:46:16 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Mees,

Current only makes sense when there is a path for it. In your case the
current will go through the input impedance of your ADC. The extremely small
current value given in its datasheet (10nA typically) is essentially leakage
current typical for high-impedance CMOS inputs. Thus, since the input
impedance is high you will never see anything close to absolute limits of
the chip pretty much regardless of the drive strength you choose. The drive
strength only tells you how much current a driver CAN drive while keeping
the output voltage range in spec. If there is no load, there is current.


/Mikhail





<m_oylulan@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149870335.699238.81850@f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> I want to use a Spartan II chip to drive two ADCs. The ADC spec says
> that the input current on the SCLK pin is +/-0.5uA max and 10nA
> typically. Similary the input current on the CS pin is 10nA typically.
> The absolute maximum ratings for the same ADC state that the maximum
> input current to any pins (except supplies) is +/-10mA. I'm using the
> LVTTL standard and can only specify the drive current to a minimum of
> 2mA. Will I be doing the ADCs potential damage if I specify 2mA to
> drive the SCLK and CS pins?
>
> Thanks,
> Mees
>



Article: 103731
Subject: Re: Rumor Control:: Will Quartus phase out supporting AHDL?
From: czerstwy <czebaka@o2.pl>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 19:48:55 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Subroto Datta napisał/a:
>   AHDL support will be there in Quartus for a long long time.The AHDL
> language, is fully maintained and supported for reasons of backwards
> compatibility. There are lots of legacy Max+Plus II designs which
> customers are migrating to Quartus for use in both existing and new
> projects. We are sensitive to our customers needs and will not do
> anything to jeopardize their productivity.

Is backward compatibility the only reason why Altera keeps AHDL in 
Quartus? Which languages Altera suggests to use in new projects?

czerstwy

Article: 103732
Subject: xilinx cable 3 doesn't talk with pc,but test ok
From: "blisca" <blisca@tiscali.it>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 20:28:39 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
hello
i built on myself a cable 3 interface,following the xilinx drawing,i checked
in all the possible ways,ohmically,injecting square waves,and then once
connected tho the parallel port i used the option in the Jtag programmer
utility that allows to force level on tdi,sending n clock pulses and so
on,these signals are present on the pins of the fpga and the cable is
connected to the supply(5V),but the pc doesn't see the cable at all
please,anyone can help me?thanks!



Article: 103733
Subject: Re: Rumor Control:: Will Quartus phase out supporting AHDL?
From: Josh Rosen <bjrosen@polybusPleaseDontSPAMme.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:35:21 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
> 
> Is backward compatibility the only reason why Altera keeps AHDL in 
> Quartus? Which languages Altera suggests to use in new projects?
> 
> czerstwy

You would never want to start a new project in an obsolete language like
AHDL or ABEL. Verilog and VHDL are the only reasonable choices for new
designs, personally I use Verilog but I don't want to start a religious
war so lets just say both of those languages are industry standards and
that code written in either can be easily ported to anybody's FPGA or ASIC.




Article: 103734
Subject: Requesting for an Actel Library
From: irfan.mohammed@gmail.com
Date: 9 Jun 2006 13:11:18 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi,

I am a student,I am new in VHDL and want to implement a project. I am
working on VHDL with  Actel Libero. In my previous implementation, I
have used the "RAMB4_S1_S1"(4K-Bit Data Dual Port Block RAM) and
"RAMB4_S1"(4K-Bit Data Single Port Block RAM) which are implemented in
the "UNISIM" in Xilinx.
Could you please provide me with the information of an equivalent
library that implement these RAMs in Actel Libero ?

Thanks in advance

Best regards


Article: 103735
Subject: Re: ppc instruction count
From: Siva Velusamy <siva.velusamy@xilinx.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 14:26:35 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Alan Nishioka wrote:
> eascheiber@yahoo.com wrote:
> 
>>just one question, in xtime_l.c XTime_GetTime function shouldn't use
>>mftb instead of mfspr. It does not seem to work ok /w mfspr.
> 
> 
> That's odd.  It does look like XTime_GetTime *should* be using mftb.
> But the mfspr code works fine for me (EDK6.1, EDK7.1, EDK8.1).
> 
> Alan Nishioka
> 

Time Base Register is just another special purpose register. From the 
documentation it looks like mftb provides read access to non privileged 
code.

mfspr should work as long as you are running privileged code..which is 
the case with most simple apps. I haven't verified this though.

-Siva

Article: 103736
Subject: Re: Rumor Control:: Will Quartus phase out supporting AHDL?
From: "Simon Peacock" <simon-quicksilver_net_nz>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 09:47:21 +1200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
I would suggest VHDL as a replacement for AHDL as the two are similar.
Simon

"Josh Rosen" <bjrosen@polybusPleaseDontSPAMme.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.06.09.19.35.20.613577@polybusPleaseDontSPAMme.com...
> >
> > Is backward compatibility the only reason why Altera keeps AHDL in
> > Quartus? Which languages Altera suggests to use in new projects?
> >
> > czerstwy
>
> You would never want to start a new project in an obsolete language like
> AHDL or ABEL. Verilog and VHDL are the only reasonable choices for new
> designs, personally I use Verilog but I don't want to start a religious
> war so lets just say both of those languages are industry standards and
> that code written in either can be easily ported to anybody's FPGA or
ASIC.
>
>
>



Article: 103737
Subject: Re: Anyone with Xilinx SP305-board ?
From: "John Smith" <someone@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:06:26 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

"radarman" <jshamlet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149698107.233187.12590@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> John Smith wrote:
> > Seemed like a good deal, but the board was only around for purchase a
few

> Have you tried searching on the Xilinx website. I was able to find:
>
> http://www.xilinx.com/products/boards/sp305/reference_designs.htm
>
http://www.xilinx.com/xlnx/xebiz/designResources/ip_product_details.jsp?key=HW-SP305-US&sGlobalNavPick=PRODUCTS&sSecondaryNavPick=BOARDS
>
> Between the two, there are reference designs (with working UCF files),
> schematics, and a user guide.
>
> -Seth

Thanks for the tips, I will check it out. It seems kind'a strange to me
though that Xilinx is discontinuing this board after a few months on the
market ?  Why is that ?




Article: 103738
Subject: Re: Anyone with Xilinx SP305-board ?
From: "John Smith" <someone@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:18:03 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>


>
> Have you tried searching on the Xilinx website. I was able to find:
>
> http://www.xilinx.com/products/boards/sp305/reference_designs.htm
>
http://www.xilinx.com/xlnx/xebiz/designResources/ip_product_details.jsp?key=HW-SP305-US&sGlobalNavPick=PRODUCTS&sSecondaryNavPick=BOARDS
>
> Between the two, there are reference designs (with working UCF files),
> schematics, and a user guide.
>

Well, I've checked  it out now, and I have downloaded all this stuff before,
so nothing new. In fact, I had to make my own  "master" UCF-file for this
board. Maybe there are some hidden treasures in the EDK files, but I'm only
using ISE.

And Xilinx does not offer any customer support either.

Not a good way to treat future customers.



Article: 103739
Subject: Re: Anyone with Xilinx SP305-board ?
From: Austin Lesea <austin@xilinx.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 15:21:31 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
John,

It is listed as out of stock.

How does that equate to discontinued?

I think I missed something.

Austin

Article: 103740
Subject: Re: xilinx cable 3 doesn't talk with pc,but test ok
From: "John Smith" <someone@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:29:02 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

"blisca" <blisca@tiscali.it> wrote in message
news:4489bd31$0$18288$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it...
> hello
> i built on myself a cable 3 interface,following the xilinx drawing,i
checked
> in all the possible ways,ohmically,injecting square waves,and then once
> connected tho the parallel port i used the option in the Jtag programmer
> utility that allows to force level on tdi,sending n clock pulses and so
> on,these signals are present on the pins of the fpga and the cable is
> connected to the supply(5V),but the pc doesn't see the cable at all
> please,anyone can help me?thanks!
>

Try the different BIOS setup options on your computer for the port in
question. It worked wonders for me, but that was a Parallel IV cable. When
it was set to ECP-mode, everything worked so much better.



Article: 103741
Subject: Re: Anyone with Xilinx SP305-board ?
From: "John Smith" <someone@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:44:16 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Commercial advertising are still banned on news, right ?

"John Adair" <g1@enterpoint.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1149708569.253658.305870@c74g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> John
>
> What are your requirements for a board? We can match the XC3S1500 on a
> number of our products just a question of what else you want on board.
> Have a look at our University Access program for discounts etc. Click
> the big green square on top right of our root page for details or
> directly at http://www.enterpoint.co.uk/uap/uap.html.
>
> John Adair
> Enterpoint Ltd.
>
>
> John Smith wrote:
> > Seemed like a good deal, but the board was only around for purchase a
few
> > months, so I guess there aren't to many  around ? Thats a shame, really
! It
> > is as far as I can tell a good board, It has a good  an powerfull FPGA;
> > Spartan 3-1500 and enough power to fullfill the requirements of my
masters
> > degree.  But the board are no longer available ? I was kind'a hoping
> > draining knowledge from other users of this board...
>



Article: 103742
Subject: Re: Anyone with Xilinx SP305-board ?
From: "John Smith" <someone@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:55:10 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

"Austin Lesea" <austin@xilinx.com> wrote in message
news:e6cs9c$7bn18@xco-news.xilinx.com...
> John,
>
> It is listed as out of stock.
>
> How does that equate to discontinued?
>
> I think I missed something.
>
The board is listed as "no longer available".

So you missed something, yes ! A fundamental knowledge of the english
language....




Article: 103743
Subject: Re: Anyone with Xilinx SP305-board ?
From: "gallen" <arlencox@gmail.com>
Date: 9 Jun 2006 16:49:52 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
What about the ML401.  It's about the same price.  You get a Virtex 4
instead of the Spartan 3.  The peripherals look about the same.  The
LX25 is a little smaller than the S3-1500, but not tons smaller and
it's still supported by webpack.

-Arlen

John Smith wrote:
> "Austin Lesea" <austin@xilinx.com> wrote in message
> news:e6cs9c$7bn18@xco-news.xilinx.com...
> > John,
> >
> > It is listed as out of stock.
> >
> > How does that equate to discontinued?
> >
> > I think I missed something.
> >
> The board is listed as "no longer available".
>
> So you missed something, yes ! A fundamental knowledge of the english
> language....


Article: 103744
Subject: Re: Anyone with Xilinx SP305-board ?
From: "John Smith" <someone@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 01:50:07 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

"Austin Lesea" <austin@xilinx.com> wrote in message
news:e6cs9c$7bn18@xco-news.xilinx.com...
> John,
>
> It is listed as out of stock.
>
> How does that equate to discontinued?
>
> I think I missed something.
>
> Austin

Well, Austin deare, I did not  meen to be rude, but when I buy hardware for
about $400, it would be very nice to have an e-mail address to post simple
questions, an get some answers to. Thats not to much to ask for.

It's kind'a like the ultimatium the US ambassador in Norway has given us:
Either you are with us, or you are against us ! (He IS a fool !)

I would not put it quite like that, I would say; I you dont offer propper
support, you will loose me as a customer. Maybe you'll regret that some
time. Remenber the first days of   The Beatles ?

I'll always manage. I'll just switch to one of Xilinxs competitors.



Article: 103745
Subject: Re: Requesting for an Actel Library
From: "Daniel Leu" <daniel.leu@gmail.com>
Date: 9 Jun 2006 16:52:22 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
There is a tool called SmartGen that you can use to generate memories
for Actel devices. It is part of your Libero installation.

irfan.mohammed@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am a student,I am new in VHDL and want to implement a project. I am
> working on VHDL with  Actel Libero. In my previous implementation, I
> have used the "RAMB4_S1_S1"(4K-Bit Data Dual Port Block RAM) and
> "RAMB4_S1"(4K-Bit Data Single Port Block RAM) which are implemented in
> the "UNISIM" in Xilinx.
> Could you please provide me with the information of an equivalent
> library that implement these RAMs in Actel Libero ?
> 
> Thanks in advance
> 
> Best regards


Article: 103746
Subject: edk 8.1
From: "cwoodring" <cwoodring@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 19:58:07 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hello,
    I have two questions that hopefully someone will be able to provide some 
info on>

        1. Has anyone developed a custom embedded PowerPC system for a card 
other than the demo boards available from vendors like Avnet, Xilinx, etc.
            I have a pmc module with 128 MB of  DDR SDRAM and 6 MB of QDRAM. 
It has a VirtexPro XC2PV70 on it also. I'd like to use EDK to
            test a ppc implementation on that card. I have vendor specific 
VHDL that allows me to read and write the memories but the code does not 
instantiate the Power PC.  I want to replace their library with cores from 
the EDK to read and write the memory from the PPC and do some basic I/O 
under control of the PPC.

        2. In EDK version 8.102i, when I try to select the Generic DDR 
controller in the base system builder the "Add devices" button of the GUI 
disappears and I can not add any more devices. If I add a UART or other 
device it seems to work ok.  I have 7.1 installed on another pc and when I 
selected the Generic DDR controller it all seemed to work ok. I haven't 
contacted Xilinx about this yet. Has anyone else noticed this bug?

Any input is appreciated,

Thanks,

CTW 



Article: 103747
Subject: R: xilinx cable 3 doesn't talk with pc,but test ok
From: "blisca" <blisca@tiscali.it>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:03:31 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

John Smith <someone@microsoft.com> wrote in message
e6cskr$ofc$2@readme.uio.no...
>
> "blisca" <blisca@tiscali.it> wrote in message
> news:4489bd31$0$18288$4fafbaef@reader1.news.tin.it...
> > hello
> > i built on myself a cable 3 interface,following the xilinx drawing,i
> checked
> > in all the possible ways,ohmically,injecting square waves,and then once
> > connected tho the parallel port i used the option in the Jtag programmer
> > utility that allows to force level on tdi,sending n clock pulses and so
> > on,these signals are present on the pins of the fpga and the cable is
> > connected to the supply(5V),but the pc doesn't see the cable at all
> > please,anyone can help me?thanks!
> >
>
> Try the different BIOS setup options on your computer for the port in
> question. It worked wonders for me, but that was a Parallel IV cable. When
> it was set to ECP-mode, everything worked so much better.
>
>
despite here in italy are 1:45 a.m. i want to follow your hint,stay tuned
and thank you



Article: 103748
Subject: Re: Anyone with Xilinx SP305-board ?
From: "John Smith" <someone@microsoft.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 02:20:33 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

"gallen" <arlencox@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1149896992.818022.324140@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> What about the ML401.  It's about the same price.  You get a Virtex 4
> instead of the Spartan 3.  The peripherals look about the same.  The
> LX25 is a little smaller than the S3-1500, but not tons smaller and
> it's still supported by webpack.

Ok, but my point is that
1: Xilinx does not offer any customer support.
2: Xilinx does not offer any customer support.
3: Xilinx does not offer any customer support.

I'ts impossiblle to get hold of the guys ! Even simple guestion !
NO saupport e-mail. NO support phone ? What am I supposed to do ?
Write a letter to Georg Dobbeltv Busk ?

Maybe thats a good idea ! That way I can tell him what a crappy ambassador
he has sent us !
I want the old one back. He understood the close relatisonship between our
to nations. The new one, with his speaches about chosing sides, will only
feed the left wing and communists. USA should never need to question our
loyalti, but when the US ambassador does that in a public speech, I feel
hurt, and I know most Norwegians does. Thats why I call him a fool.




Article: 103749
Subject: Re: Anyone with Xilinx SP305-board ?
From: Ed McGettigan <ed.mcgettigan@xilinx.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 17:45:24 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
John Smith wrote:
> "gallen" <arlencox@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1149896992.818022.324140@y43g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> What about the ML401.  It's about the same price.  You get a Virtex 4
>> instead of the Spartan 3.  The peripherals look about the same.  The
>> LX25 is a little smaller than the S3-1500, but not tons smaller and
>> it's still supported by webpack.
> 
> Ok, but my point is that
> 1: Xilinx does not offer any customer support.
> 2: Xilinx does not offer any customer support.
> 3: Xilinx does not offer any customer support.
> 
> I'ts impossiblle to get hold of the guys ! Even simple guestion !
> NO saupport e-mail. NO support phone ? What am I supposed to do ?

I would suggest that you try http://support.xilinx.com Right at the
top you will see a tab labeled "Contact Support" where you can follow
the links to file a WebCase on your issue or to get the phone number
for technical support as well.

In additional to our official support channels we also monitored this
newsgroup for issues.  To claim that Xilinx does not offer any customer
support is a bit of hyperbole.

Ed McGettigan
--
Xilinx Inc.



Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search