Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search

Messages from 106700

Article: 106700
Subject: EDK vs. ISE for image processing
From: "fpganovice" <alecwei@gmail.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 09:51:20 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi all,

I'm working on an FPGA implementation of an image processing algorithm.
 I'll be using the ML401 to do the job which has DDR memory and a VGA
port to output the image directly on screen.  Should I go with a
microblaze solution?  EDK comes with DDR and VGA controllers for this
board, however I'm not at all familiar with it regarding the buses and
stuff.  If I use ISE only, I'll probably use MIG 1.5 to generate the
memory controller and I've also found a VGA/LCD display module on
opencores.org.  So both solutions seem viable to me (or do they not?),
which path should I choose?  Please comment.  Thanks!


Article: 106701
Subject: Re: Crystal input for FPGA
From: "Symon" <symon_brewer@hotmail.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 19:01:43 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Many thanks!
Syms.



Article: 106702
Subject: Re: Using an FPGA as USB HOST without PHY
From: "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 10:15:07 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
bm wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> Isi it possible to connect directly FPGA ouptuts to USB line like this :
> http://osainto.free.fr/USBHOST/usbDirect.pdf
> (Pull downs are necessary to be able to act as USB Host.)
> And then  to use a dedicated IP for USB host role (some on opencores )

Which version of USB are you interested in?  USB Full Speed has much
less stringent requirements on the PHY than does USB v 2.0 High Speed.
I have not heard of anyone doing either in an FPGA, but I don't know
that it won't work for Full Speed.


Article: 106703
Subject: Why is Spartan-3 more expensive than Cyclone?
From: jidan1@hotmail.com
Date: 17 Aug 2006 10:19:27 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi everyone,

I compared the prices of two FPGAs from Digikey
(http://www.digikey.com):
+) Xilinx Spartan-3, XC3S1000 - 4FTG256C with LC:1920, I/O pins:173.
Price:  47.87$

+) Altera Cyclone, EP1C6Q240C8N - ND with LC:5980, I/O pins:185.
Price: 18.9$

Im relativly new to the FPGA world, but given the larger numbers of
LC's and I/O pins that cyclone has, I don't understand why spartan-3 is
more expensive? Is there another parameter that I am missing here? Note
that I don't find these huge price differences only in Digikey.

JJ


Article: 106704
Subject: Re: EDK vs. ISE for image processing
From: "MM" <mbmsv@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 13:29:52 -0400
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
"fpganovice" <alecwei@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1155833480.035692.283020@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Hi all,
>
> I'm working on an FPGA implementation of an image processing algorithm.
>  I'll be using the ML401 to do the job which has DDR memory and a VGA
> port to output the image directly on screen.  Should I go with a
> microblaze solution?  EDK comes with DDR and VGA controllers for this
> board, however I'm not at all familiar with it regarding the buses and
> stuff.  If I use ISE only, I'll probably use MIG 1.5 to generate the
> memory controller and I've also found a VGA/LCD display module on
> opencores.org.  So both solutions seem viable to me (or do they not?),
> which path should I choose?  Please comment.  Thanks!
>

If you don't need a CPU, then you don't need EDK either. If you do need a
CPU, it is much easier to use EDK. However, if you decide not to use EDK you
will probably have to spend more time interfacing your pieces, e.g. the
opencores VGA controller probably needs a Wishbone bus...

On the side note, it might be worth mentioning that some of the EDK
ready-to-use cores are behind performance-wise from what is generally
available, e.g. I believe MIG allows for faster DDRAM interfaces than you
could achieve by using any of the EDK memory controllers.


/Mikhail



Article: 106705
Subject: Re: Why is Spartan-3 more expensive than Cyclone?
From: "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 10:32:51 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
jid...@hotmail.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I compared the prices of two FPGAs from Digikey
> (http://www.digikey.com):
> +) Xilinx Spartan-3, XC3S1000 - 4FTG256C with LC:1920, I/O pins:173.
> Price:  47.87$
>
> +) Altera Cyclone, EP1C6Q240C8N - ND with LC:5980, I/O pins:185.
> Price: 18.9$
>
> Im relativly new to the FPGA world, but given the larger numbers of
> LC's and I/O pins that cyclone has, I don't understand why spartan-3 is
> more expensive? Is there another parameter that I am missing here? Note
> that I don't find these huge price differences only in Digikey.

Possibly because you are comparing two very different sized parts in
two very different packages.

The EP1C6 is in a 240 pin QFP (read lower cost package) with about 6000
LEs.  The XC3S1000 is a newer technology which should be cheaper, but
you picked a BGA package (which tends to cost more than QFPs) and a
*much* larger part.  The XC3S1000 has 1920 CLBs with 8 LCs each or
15,360 (compared to the 17,280 claimed by the data sheet).  I think the
XC3S400 would be a better comparison with about 7,168 LCs.

I suggest that you compare the Cyclone II and pick an equivalent part.
How about the EP2C20F256C8 with 18,752 LCs in the same 256 pin BGA at
$42.70...?  Now it is only a bit cheaper.


Article: 106706
Subject: Re: Alternative for Mentor''s HDL Designer
From: Mike Treseler <mike_treseler@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:36:59 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
radarman wrote:

> I agree - which is why I only produce state machines in HDL Designer
> that need to be documented, or are designed by someone else. 

The quartus hdl/state machine viewer
works the other way around.
It picks state machines out of vhdl or verilog
code and can print them like this:

http://home.comcast.net/~mike_treseler/pseudo_states.pdf

    -- Mike Treseler

Article: 106707
Subject: Re: EDK vs. ISE for image processing
From: "fpganovice" <alecwei@gmail.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 10:39:40 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Hi Mikhail,

Thanks for your reply.  The VGA core does use a Wishbone bus, and it
has built-in Wishbone master and slave interfaces.  It seems like I
just need to set some registers through the slave and get access to
external memory through the master.  Therefore I was thinking those
interfaces could connect with my FPGA hardware directly, or do I still
need something to talk to the core?

Thanks again.


MM wrote:
> "fpganovice" <alecwei@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1155833480.035692.283020@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm working on an FPGA implementation of an image processing algorithm.
> >  I'll be using the ML401 to do the job which has DDR memory and a VGA
> > port to output the image directly on screen.  Should I go with a
> > microblaze solution?  EDK comes with DDR and VGA controllers for this
> > board, however I'm not at all familiar with it regarding the buses and
> > stuff.  If I use ISE only, I'll probably use MIG 1.5 to generate the
> > memory controller and I've also found a VGA/LCD display module on
> > opencores.org.  So both solutions seem viable to me (or do they not?),
> > which path should I choose?  Please comment.  Thanks!
> >
>
> If you don't need a CPU, then you don't need EDK either. If you do need a
> CPU, it is much easier to use EDK. However, if you decide not to use EDK you
> will probably have to spend more time interfacing your pieces, e.g. the
> opencores VGA controller probably needs a Wishbone bus...
>
> On the side note, it might be worth mentioning that some of the EDK
> ready-to-use cores are behind performance-wise from what is generally
> available, e.g. I believe MIG allows for faster DDRAM interfaces than you
> could achieve by using any of the EDK memory controllers.
> 
> 
> /Mikhail


Article: 106708
Subject: Re: Using an FPGA as USB HOST without PHY
From: "bm" <nospam@nospam.fr>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 19:42:48 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Full Speed
"rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:1155834907.449717.107780@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> bm wrote:
>> Hi everybody,
>> Isi it possible to connect directly FPGA ouptuts to USB line like this :
>> http://osainto.free.fr/USBHOST/usbDirect.pdf
>> (Pull downs are necessary to be able to act as USB Host.)
>> And then  to use a dedicated IP for USB host role (some on opencores )
>
> Which version of USB are you interested in?  USB Full Speed has much
> less stringent requirements on the PHY than does USB v 2.0 High Speed.
> I have not heard of anyone doing either in an FPGA, but I don't know
> that it won't work for Full Speed.
> 



Article: 106709
Subject: Re: Using an FPGA as USB HOST without PHY
From: "Antti" <Antti.Lukats@xilant.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 10:50:44 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
bm schrieb:

> Full Speed
> "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1155834907.449717.107780@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > bm wrote:
> >> Hi everybody,
> >> Isi it possible to connect directly FPGA ouptuts to USB line like this :
> >> http://osainto.free.fr/USBHOST/usbDirect.pdf
> >> (Pull downs are necessary to be able to act as USB Host.)
> >> And then  to use a dedicated IP for USB host role (some on opencores )
> >
> > Which version of USB are you interested in?  USB Full Speed has much
> > less stringent requirements on the PHY than does USB v 2.0 High Speed.
> > I have not heard of anyone doing either in an FPGA, but I don't know
> > that it won't work for Full Speed.
> >

FS and LS should be no big issue. There are some folks doing LS host
with 100% software in small 2USD microcontrollers!

one japanese FPGA guy has some nifty usb host thing, he has developed
a special 1 bit processor that he uses as USB host engine. well the
purpose
for him is to use USB keyboard for some gaming gadget.

Antti
http://xilant.com


Article: 106710
Subject: Re: FFT on an FPGA
From: Evan Lavelle <eml@nospam.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 18:59:48 +0100
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:04:44 -0500, "RCIngham"
<robert.ingham@smiths-aerospace.com> wrote:

>I suspect that the Xilinx core is fixed-point, and handles the data growth
>that happens during a FFT in some manner described in its documentation. If
>it doesn't, then don't use it.

It's fixed-point (vfft32 is, anyway). It does bit growth, but you have
to handle the extra bits yourself.

>You could use a number representation such as Q1.15 that handles numbers
>in the range -1.0 to +1.0, and do scaling at each pass of the FFT.

This is actually no better than an integer representation - if you
start with Q1.15, then you have to extend to Q1.18, or whatever, after
the first pass, and so on.

Fixed-point FFTs are pretty useless. If you've got a small dynamic
range in the input, then you'll have a large dynamic range in the
output. Coding a floating-point adder and multiplier is probably a lot
easier than understanding the limitations of a fixed-point FFT and
using it effectively.

Evan

Article: 106711
Subject: Re: FFT on an FPGA
From: "Raymond" <raybakk@yahoo.no>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 11:05:57 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
The FFT core is not floatingpoint as far as I know.

I can input real data strait from an AD converter (witch is fixpoint in
nature). My problem is acually that I need a windowing function on top
of that. I think the windowing function multiply the data from an AD
converter with a variable that vary from 0 (in the beginning of the
datastream) to 1 (in the middle of it) to 0 again in the end, and that
ends up with a floatingpoint number.

Raymond


Article: 106712
Subject: Re: Using an FPGA as USB HOST without PHY
From: "bm" <nospam@nospam.fr>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 20:12:28 +0200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Interesting ...Any pointer ?

"Antti" <Antti.Lukats@xilant.com> wrote in message 
news:1155837044.650337.85350@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
> bm schrieb:
>
>> Full Speed
>> "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1155834907.449717.107780@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> > bm wrote:
>> >> Hi everybody,
>> >> Isi it possible to connect directly FPGA ouptuts to USB line like this 
>> >> :
>> >> http://osainto.free.fr/USBHOST/usbDirect.pdf
>> >> (Pull downs are necessary to be able to act as USB Host.)
>> >> And then  to use a dedicated IP for USB host role (some on opencores )
>> >
>> > Which version of USB are you interested in?  USB Full Speed has much
>> > less stringent requirements on the PHY than does USB v 2.0 High Speed.
>> > I have not heard of anyone doing either in an FPGA, but I don't know
>> > that it won't work for Full Speed.
>> >
>
> FS and LS should be no big issue. There are some folks doing LS host
> with 100% software in small 2USD microcontrollers!
>
> one japanese FPGA guy has some nifty usb host thing, he has developed
> a special 1 bit processor that he uses as USB host engine. well the
> purpose
> for him is to use USB keyboard for some gaming gadget.
>
> Antti
> http://xilant.com
> 



Article: 106713
Subject: Re: FFT on an FPGA
From: "Raymond" <raybakk@yahoo.no>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 11:15:59 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

Raymond skrev:
> The FFT core is not floatingpoint as far as I know.
OBS I MENT FIXPOINT SORRY

>
> I can input real data strait from an AD converter (witch is fixpoint in
> nature). My problem is acually that I need a windowing function on top
> of that. I think the windowing function multiply the data from an AD
> converter with a variable that vary from 0 (in the beginning of the
> datastream) to 1 (in the middle of it) to 0 again in the end, and that
> ends up with a floatingpoint number.
> 
> Raymond


Article: 106714
Subject: Re: FFT on an FPGA
From: "pomerado@hotmail.com" <pomerado@hotmail.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 11:17:27 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

Raymond wrote:
> The FFT core is not floatingpoint as far as I know.
>
> I can input real data strait from an AD converter (witch is fixpoint in
> nature). My problem is acually that I need a windowing function on top
> of that. I think the windowing function multiply the data from an AD
> converter with a variable that vary from 0 (in the beginning of the
> datastream) to 1 (in the middle of it) to 0 again in the end, and that
> ends up with a floatingpoint number.

So you need a fixed-point windowing fucntion.


Article: 106715
Subject: Re: Why is Spartan-3 more expensive than Cyclone?
From: "bart" <bart.borosky@latticesemi.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 11:19:16 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
jidan1@hotmail.com wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I compared the prices of two FPGAs from Digikey
> (http://www.digikey.com):
> +) Xilinx Spartan-3, XC3S1000 - 4FTG256C with LC:1920, I/O pins:173.
> Price:  47.87$
>
> +) Altera Cyclone, EP1C6Q240C8N - ND with LC:5980, I/O pins:185.
> Price: 18.9$
>
> Im relativly new to the FPGA world, but given the larger numbers of
> LC's and I/O pins that cyclone has, I don't understand why spartan-3 is
> more expensive? Is there another parameter that I am missing here? Note
> that I don't find these huge price differences only in Digikey.
>
> JJ
the price difference would be mainly due to the difference in logic
density. the Xilinx XC3S1000 has more LUTs (4-input Look Up Tables)
than the Altera EP1C6. if price is a concern, you might consider
Lattice's low cost FPGA, the LatticeEC

Vendor    Device          LUTs         1pc. Price
--------   -----------    ---------     ----------
Xilinx     XC3S1000       15K          ~$50.00
Altera     EP1C6          6K           ~$19.00
Lattice    LFEC6          6K           ~$18.00
Lattice    LFEC15         15K          ~$36.00

http://www.latticesemi.com/products/fpga/index.cfm
hope this helps.
rgds,
bart, lattice


Article: 106716
Subject: Re: Using an FPGA as USB HOST without PHY
From: "Antti" <Antti.Lukats@xilant.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 11:23:11 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
bm schrieb:

> Interesting ...Any pointer ?

you really learn how to goofle ! :)

just enter "usb fpga ukp" as search term and there you, first hit!

Antti


Article: 106717
Subject: Re: Using an FPGA as USB HOST without PHY
From: "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 11:44:45 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Antti wrote:
> bm schrieb:
>
> > Interesting ...Any pointer ?
>
> you really learn how to goofle ! :)
>
> just enter "usb fpga ukp" as search term and there you, first hit!

Was this a typo?  I get a bunch of links to sites giving pricing in
Brittish pounds.

Maybe you were referring to this...

http://www.opencores.org/projects.cgi/web/usb_phy/overview


Article: 106718
Subject: Re: Why is Spartan-3 more expensive than Cyclone?
From: "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 11:47:26 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
bart wrote:
> jidan1@hotmail.com wrote:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I compared the prices of two FPGAs from Digikey
> > (http://www.digikey.com):
> > +) Xilinx Spartan-3, XC3S1000 - 4FTG256C with LC:1920, I/O pins:173.
> > Price:  47.87$
> >
> > +) Altera Cyclone, EP1C6Q240C8N - ND with LC:5980, I/O pins:185.
> > Price: 18.9$
> >
> > Im relativly new to the FPGA world, but given the larger numbers of
> > LC's and I/O pins that cyclone has, I don't understand why spartan-3 is
> > more expensive? Is there another parameter that I am missing here? Note
> > that I don't find these huge price differences only in Digikey.
> >
> > JJ
> the price difference would be mainly due to the difference in logic
> density. the Xilinx XC3S1000 has more LUTs (4-input Look Up Tables)
> than the Altera EP1C6. if price is a concern, you might consider
> Lattice's low cost FPGA, the LatticeEC
>
> Vendor    Device          LUTs         1pc. Price
> --------   -----------    ---------     ----------
> Xilinx     XC3S1000       15K          ~$50.00
> Altera     EP1C6          6K           ~$19.00
> Lattice    LFEC6          6K           ~$18.00
> Lattice    LFEC15         15K          ~$36.00
>
> http://www.latticesemi.com/products/fpga/index.cfm
> hope this helps.
> rgds,
> bart, lattice

What about the LFE2 parts?  I thought they were starting to ship now
and even cheaper.


Article: 106719
Subject: Re: Why is Spartan-3 more expensive than Cyclone?
From: "bart" <bart.borosky@latticesemi.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 12:17:13 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
rickman wrote:

> What about the LFE2 parts?  I thought they were starting to ship now
> and even cheaper.

the original question referred to distributors such as Digikey, so at
the 6K and 15K LUT densities, the 130nm LatticeEC is the best fit for
devices that are available from Mouser and other specialized
distributors off the shelf.

you're right, the 90nm LatticeECP2 device is now sampling and is lower
priced, however the smaller densities (6K-15KLUT) of the LatticeECP2
are not currently available through distributors such as Mouser.
http://www.mouser.com/latticesemi/


Article: 106720
Subject: Re: Using an FPGA as USB HOST without PHY
From: "Antti" <Antti.Lukats@xilant.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 12:23:25 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>

rickman schrieb:

> Antti wrote:
> > bm schrieb:
> >
> > > Interesting ...Any pointer ?
> >
> > you really learn how to goofle ! :)
> >
> > just enter "usb fpga ukp" as search term and there you, first hit!
>
> Was this a typo?  I get a bunch of links to sites giving pricing in
> Brittish pounds.
>
> Maybe you were referring to this...
>
> http://www.opencores.org/projects.cgi/web/usb_phy/overview
NO.
and NO typo.

google search web search from my PC with keywords "usb fpga ukp"
returns as first hit the following URL (I just rechecked!)

http://www.geocities.jp/kwhr0/hard/pc8001.html

Antti


Article: 106721
Subject: Re: S3 starter kit, command-line
From: burn.sir@gmail.com
Date: 17 Aug 2006 12:27:21 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Well, I really had enough of this last night (with Impact crashing
every 5 minutes instead of the usual every 20 minutes). Was so -><-
close to trash the board and pretend it was bricked :)


Somehow, I forced  myself to go back to it when I got home right after
work, and tried to read from flash after configuration. I got
mismatches like this in few places (above: read, below: original mcs):


7485,7490c7485,7490
< :10D3A000000000000000000000000000FFFFFFFF81
< :10D3B000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF7D
< :10D3C000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF6D
< :10D3D000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF5D
< :10D3E000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF4D
< :10D3F000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF3D
---
> :10D3A000000000000000000000000000000000007D
> :10D3B000000000000000000000000000000000006D
> :10D3C000000000000000000000000000000000005D
> :10D3D000000000000000000000000000000000004D
> :10D3E000000000000000000000000000000000003D
> :10D3F000000000000000000000000000000000002D


The error rate is something like 2-3%. The board is new*, the cable is
new. Hell, even the computer I ran this from is shiny new. Everything
works just fine when programming the FPGA directly.

Does Anyone know what the problem is? Is xilinx flash this unreliable,
or am I doing something wrong?


regards
- Burns



* actually its really old, but totally unused. I just haven't cared
enough to play with my xilinx boards. Very much thanks to a scary first
encounter with ISE...


Article: 106722
Subject: Re: S3 starter kit, command-line
From: Jim Granville <no.spam@designtools.maps.co.nz>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 09:19:42 +1200
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
burn.sir@gmail.com wrote:

> Well, I really had enough of this last night (with Impact crashing
> every 5 minutes instead of the usual every 20 minutes). Was so -><-
> close to trash the board and pretend it was bricked :)
> 
> 
> Somehow, I forced  myself to go back to it when I got home right after
> work, and tried to read from flash after configuration. I got
> mismatches like this in few places (above: read, below: original mcs):
> 
> 
> 7485,7490c7485,7490
> < :10D3A000000000000000000000000000FFFFFFFF81
> < :10D3B000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF7D
> < :10D3C000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF6D
> < :10D3D000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF5D
> < :10D3E000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF4D
> < :10D3F000FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF3D
> ---
> 
>>:10D3A000000000000000000000000000000000007D
>>:10D3B000000000000000000000000000000000006D
>>:10D3C000000000000000000000000000000000005D
>>:10D3D000000000000000000000000000000000004D
>>:10D3E000000000000000000000000000000000003D
>>:10D3F000000000000000000000000000000000002D
> 
> 
> 
> The error rate is something like 2-3%. The board is new*, the cable is
> new. Hell, even the computer I ran this from is shiny new. Everything
> works just fine when programming the FPGA directly.
> 
> Does Anyone know what the problem is? Is xilinx flash this unreliable,
> or am I doing something wrong?
> 
> 
> regards
> - Burns
> 
> 
> 
> * actually its really old, but totally unused. I just haven't cared
> enough to play with my xilinx boards. Very much thanks to a scary first
> encounter with ISE...

That looks like it just stopped writing 0's ?

If you read 30 times, do you get the matching 30 results ? - that checks 
read integrity.
Can you get the Flash into a device programmer, that can read it.
That gives a second verify of contents.

Are these errors always at start/finish. ?
I have seen other devices flash-error on preamble or post-amble
timing errors.

-jg



Article: 106723
Subject: Re: Using an FPGA as USB HOST without PHY
From: "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Date: 17 Aug 2006 15:05:23 -0700
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Antti wrote:
> rickman schrieb:
>
> > Antti wrote:
> > > bm schrieb:
> > >
> > > > Interesting ...Any pointer ?
> > >
> > > you really learn how to goofle ! :)
> > >
> > > just enter "usb fpga ukp" as search term and there you, first hit!
> >
> > Was this a typo?  I get a bunch of links to sites giving pricing in
> > Brittish pounds.
> >
> > Maybe you were referring to this...
> >
> > http://www.opencores.org/projects.cgi/web/usb_phy/overview
> NO.
> and NO typo.
>
> google search web search from my PC with keywords "usb fpga ukp"
> returns as first hit the following URL (I just rechecked!)
>
> http://www.geocities.jp/kwhr0/hard/pc8001.html

Well I guess you are just special then.  I get
http://lists.distributed.net/pipermail/hardware/1998-October/000325.html
and I would have no idea why you would use "ukp" as part of the search.
 Care to explain or do you prefer to remail mysterious about it?

BTW, the address you posted gives me a web page in an Asian language,
possibly Japanese.  I am not able to read any of it.


Article: 106724
Subject: Re: FFT on an FPGA
From: lb.edc@telenet.be
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2006 22:25:13 GMT
Links: << >>  << T >>  << A >>
Raymond,
In what you are describing, it looks like you are actually doing a FIR
filter in the frequency domain.
So my question, why not using this FIR filter? It it far less complex
than a FFT, and the result will be the same. Even if it is a complex
window, you can use the Remez Exchange algo to work it out.

Regards,

Luc

On 17 Aug 2006 11:15:59 -0700, "Raymond" <raybakk@yahoo.no> wrote:

>
>Raymond skrev:
>> The FFT core is not floatingpoint as far as I know.
>OBS I MENT FIXPOINT SORRY
>
>>
>> I can input real data strait from an AD converter (witch is fixpoint in
>> nature). My problem is acually that I need a windowing function on top
>> of that. I think the windowing function multiply the data from an AD
>> converter with a variable that vary from 0 (in the beginning of the
>> datastream) to 1 (in the middle of it) to 0 again in the end, and that
>> ends up with a floatingpoint number.
>> 
>> Raymond



Site Home   Archive Home   FAQ Home   How to search the Archive   How to Navigate the Archive   
Compare FPGA features and resources   

Threads starting:
1994JulAugSepOctNovDec1994
1995JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1995
1996JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1996
1997JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1997
1998JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1998
1999JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec1999
2000JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2000
2001JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2001
2002JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2002
2003JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2003
2004JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2004
2005JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2005
2006JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2006
2007JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2007
2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2008
2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009
2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010
2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011
2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012
2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013
2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014
2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015
2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016
2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017
2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018
2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019
2020JanFebMarAprMay2020

Authors:A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Custom Search